22nd November 2011 / Posted in: Communication strategy, LinkedIn
One of the LinkedIn features I particularly enjoy is the well-considered, thought-provoking questions and answers about subjects in which I have an interest - both in Groups and Answers. The different viewpoints have expanded my horizons, knowledge and interests. My perception of many contributors - most of whom I’ve never met - has been enhanced by their on-line contributions and I feel I’ve benefited from them sharing their knowledge and experiences.
There’s a wealth of knowledge, skills and experience I know I can tap into through LinkedIn if I need an opinion or expert knowledge, but I'm cautious how I use it. Why? Because there are people in some of the Groups I follow who are happy to post trivial, or poorly constructed, questions without realising the damage it does to their credibility. I’m wondering if they've heard that asking questions on LinkedIn raises their profile so ask anything rather than stopping to think whether their question is more appropriate for Google?
Recently I received a recommendation request from someone I had met, only briefly, at a networking event. Despite being from someone working in marketing the request was full of spelling mistakes, grammatical errors and mis-use of capitals. I politely turned it down saying my reputation is at stake when I make a recommendation and my policy is not to make recommendations without first hand experience. The sender understood so I then decided to take a risk and give them some feedback about their e-mail for the simple reason I'm a giver and I was likely to come across them again at a networking event. I read and re-read what I wrote quite a few times before I pressed send as I didn’t want my feedback misinterpreted by the recipient. The effort paid off as the recipient responded immediately expressing considerable thanks for the feedback particularly as I’d bothered to take the time to do it just after 6pm on Friday evening. They now understand a bit more about me and I know they’ve spent time reading my profile.
LinkedIn can be a very powerful tool, and whether you work for yourself or within a company you will have skills, knowledge, expertise you may wish to share. It takes time to climb on top of the metaphorical pedestal, but a stupid question, or ill-considered answer, can send you plummeting to the floor. Understandably some companies get jumpy about their staff being active on LinkedIn, but investing in decent guidelines (rules are there to break) and training about the brand will deliver great benefits all round.
In short, LinkedIn builds trust, relationships and credibility and can be a valuable part of your marketing mix, but like everything worthwhile it takes time and effort to get results. On the other hand destroying your credibility takes just seconds.
0 comments | Add comment >
5th September 2011 / Posted in: Communication strategy, Marketing strategy, Social media, Social networking
If you inadvertently say something upsetting, or unkind, to someone’s face you can usually see in their expression, and in their eyes, that you’ve got it wrong. Because you’re there you’ve seen what you’ve done and you’ve the chance to eat humble pie and put things right.
In today’s world of instant electronic communication where speed is everything short, rushed messages are becoming the norm. As messages get shorter and shorter the scope for misinterpretation can grow. I don’t know about you, but I’ve been on the receiving end of some pretty poor electronic communications. Some have been irritating, some have been rude, some have upset me. If they’re from people I know I’m usually too nice to say anything - I just think they’re busy or having a bad day. Others have been poorly constructed, use bad grammar, use capitals incorrectly and have spelling mistakes. Last week I received a number of e-mails, and an attachment relating to a specific project, from an organisation that formed earlier this year and spent a fortune on their corporate identity. Amazingly none of the e-mails had a sign off saying the name of the organisation or the contact details for the sender, never mind a logo or consistent use of colour and typeface. The attachment didn’t even have a title, reference to the project to which it referred or a date. Unbelievable!
I wonder how many people read what they are about to send before they send it, think how it looks and consider whether the words they have used could mean something other than what they want to say. What do you do and what horrors have you experienced?
0 comments | Add comment >
27th July 2011 / Posted in: Branding, Communication strategy, Marketing strategy, Social media, Social networking, Social networking policy

0 comments | Add comment >
8th April 2011 / Posted in: Blogging, Communication strategy, Marketing strategy, Social media, Social networking, Social networking policy, Strategy, Tweeting, Twitter
As a result of my social networking I was invited to the Payroll World Spring Update Conference (www.payrollworld.com/springupdate/) to demystify social media, and as an effective user of social media the following is a blog of the presentation.
The presentation was a whistle-stop tour covering:
Many people think of Facebook when they think of social media those with kids probably wonder why they’re chatting on Facebook with their school friends when they only saw them half an hour ago. It’s no different now from how kids used spend time on the phone.
But there’s a lot more to social media than Facebook - particularly from a business context. It’s no longer the “new” thing - it’s here to stay, so we can’t ignore the changes going on around us and whilst we need to adapt, the needs of the business must come first.
According to Wikipedia social media is: “a blending of web-based or mobile technologies and social interaction for the co-creation of value”
In essence it’s how we use todays web-based technologies - at home and on the move to communicate, and this interaction creates value by enriching our lives in some way.
In the same way the marketing mix is made up of a number of different communication channels such as advertising - TV, radio, press etc, PR, direct marketing, to name a few, social media is made up of 6 broad categories. As with advertorial - which is paid editorial - there is a cross over between some of the core types of social media and as technology advances the cross overs will probably become greater.
In the same way an organisation would use a combination of press and TV advertising supported with PR, if the marketing strategy defines that social media as an appropriate tool to reach their market then they are unlikely to find that using one communication channel will meet their strategic aims.
One of the problems encountered with social media is people focus too much on the tools rather than what they are trying to achieve. I often come across businesses and individuals who say ‘I must start tweeting’ rather than I’m tweeting, blogging and using LinkedIn to build relationships with my target audience.
I must stress these are only a few examples in each sector as there are many, many others you may have heard of.
Firstly - unlike other, traditional media social media is free whereas traditional forms of media used to take products or services to market have all had a cost - both in terms of media space and in preparation of the communication for that medium. It’s also immediate and can have very little or no lead in time.
The biggest difference is that social operates on three levels:
Social media is simply a communication channel but where social media differs from other communication channels is that any member of staff can set up accounts on various social media platforms and blog or chat away. It operates in real time so there aren’t the lead in times with most forms of social media as there are with traditional forms, and communicating in real time social media can add value to a business.
Conversely, whilst you may think that because it’s real time, it’s instant therefore it’s out of date or forgotten very quickly. However everything posted on the web can be found at a future date so there are other risks and benefits.
From a business point of view, the main reasons people use social media are for:
However a company chooses to use social media it should be driven by their communications strategy and not something they fall into. An attitudinal change is probably needed for social media to become an intrinsic part of the communication internally and externally.
Social networking should be part of the communication and marketing strategy which is driven by business strategy so it’s essential that whoever writes the social media strategy understands what the business needs, and if it is to be successful there is board level buy-in.
Marketing, Human resources and IT need to work together to develop and implement a social networking strategy to ensure the brand is communicated accurately, internally and externally, in everything they do.
I’m sure everyone has concerns about social media or works with colleagues that do, however if you start looking for negatives - you’ll never stop finding them.
Rather than take the cup half full approach, embrace the positives and have sensible guidelines to protect against the negatives. Having reams of strict rules won’t work as most people have an inner child - telling them something isn’t allowed makes them rebel and they give it a try. The fact that many staff will have smart phones means they can access social media throughout the day if they choose to.
Kodak have been actively using social media for 4 years & Thomas Hoehn, Director of Interactive Marketing says that the fears people used as reasons to avoid social media just never materialised. (http://www.kodak.com/US/images/en/corp/aboutKodak/onlineToday/Kodak_SocialMediaTips_Aug14.pdf)
SFM Consulting can provide training for individuals and companies to help them get started with social networking.
Read more on Unravelling Social Media >
0 comments | Add comment >
25th March 2011 / Posted in: Blogging, Communication strategy, Marketing strategy, Social networking, Social networking policy, Strategy, Time management, Tweeting, Twitter
An invitation from Sussex Enterprise to present a case study about my blogging experiences at their “Blogging 4 Business” breakfast networking event was proof that my blogging is working.
I gave this presentation on 15th March 2011 following Richard Smith of the Internet Consultancy (www.theinternetconsultancy.com) presenting “A handful of fundamentally important things you need to know about blogging for business” and James McLeod of Narvi Digital Media (www.narvi.co.uk) presenting “Your blog, how to get started.”
I work in the B2B sector as a business consultant advising business directors on making their strategy reality through:
It involves getting inside a business, so building trust is an integral part of winning client business. When I reflect on where my clients come from, and the collaborative opportunities in which I have become involved, none have come from cold calling.
They’ve all come from:
In essence all my business opportunities have arisen from people getting to know me as an individual - either face to face, or through the personality (my brand) that I have developed through social networking. Consequently my marketing strategy focuses on putting myself in front of people - physically and through what I write.
Blogging is just one of the tools I use to deliver my marketing strategy and I try to blog every couple of weeks. The other tools I use include:
If networking is something you do to grow your business - whether it’s face to face or social - it’s important to remember that the golden rule - give before you take! Help someone else first. If you don’t comment on their blog - don’t be surprised when they don’t comment on yours.
All these activities also drive traffic to my website - and the reason I want traffic is that my website is where you find the detailed information about my business skills and experience. It underpins “the real me” which I present through my networking activity.
I have to admit that my first foray into blogging was my husband’s idea. His career has been in corporate and financial PR so I reckoned he knew a thing or two about communications. He suggested I interview CEO’s of SMEs about their business experiences and publish the interviews on my website as “lessons learned” For anyone familiar with McKinsey Quarterly you’ve spotted where this idea came from. At this point I should add my husband works with FTSE 100’s .... and I don’t.
The first was an interview with an outgoing CEO and incoming CEO - both of whom had worked together and would continue to do so after the changeover. It was a very interesting interview. It took many hours of work from preparation before the interview to publishing but I achieved it in less than 4 weeks. This first blog was 2433 words and when I saw very little traffic to my website my husband was very supportive and said I just needed to do more interviews. So I did. The most recent was a staggering 5482 words. The first part of the interview took place in April 2010 and I finally published it in October 2010. Again, a fascinating process, hours and hours of work but the results were the same. Checking Google Analytics was depressing - the Lessons Learned hadn’t driven traffic to my website.
Before I set up another lessons learned interview I decided to take stock, look at what I was doing and try something else. I was aiming at a different market from my husband so I decided to make use of the contacts I’d made through networking - many of whom blogged. I read their blogs, I asked lots of questions and the turning point was an invitation to a social networking event organised and hosted by a451 (www.a451.co.uk).
There were two speakers at the event who used social networking in contrasting ways - Francoise Murat an interior and architectural garden designer (www.francoisemurat.com) who had grown her business using social networking and Dr Tony Mobbs from IBM who talked about how social networking enabled collaboration and learning within IBM.
After hearing what other people did, reading other blogs and listening to Francoise I decided that “lessons learned” was not right for me and what I needed to do was write short, punchy and relevant blogs as the market to which I’m appealing hasn’t the time, or inclination, to read 5,000 words. My brand is me - not what my husband thinks it should be, so it’s essential that this comes across in everything I do and write. One of the phrases I use to describe branding is “your brand is like the words in a stick of rock - the same all the way through.”
I used Wordpress to blog, which had been embedded in my website by my designer, and to speed up Tweeting I took a step outside my comfort zone. I needed something to link Wordpress to Twitter so asked and read about plug ins then downloaded one that linked the two so my blogs would be tweeted automatically. I also published my blogs on LinkedIn and circulated to relevant LinkedIn groups. As the tweeting of a blog is a moment in time I’ve learned to circulate more than once - but not to the extent my followers think I’m milking it!
Read more on Blogging 4 Business >
0 comments | Add comment >
Next Page > | Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 >